Everyone has the same right and freedom to do what they want, as long as it does not cause harm to the society, and decision made by others should be respected. (Messerli, 2009) gay marriage is the matter of civil and equal rights, and the decision to get married should belong to the couple in love, and this should not be regulated by the government. (Anton, 2008) even though many people are not comfortable with homosexual relationship, the equality and dignity of gay couples should be respected. (Cline, 2010) Moreover, gay marriage is a personal commitment that the society should not be dictating. Withholding the right to sign a legal contract between two loving people is a severe violation of human rights. 3.1.2 Marriage is between two individual A marriage is a relationship between two people that love each other.
Essay about Religion and gay rights - 1124 Words bartleby
Furthermore, the laws regarding gay marriage and the benefits brought by such marriage are different in every country. For example, in Netherlands, a gay wedding can only be performed if one of the spouses has Dutch nationality. On the other hand, people can perform same - sex marriage without a residency requirement in Canada. (bbc news, 2005) In Australia, same - sex marriage is not permitted under Australian federal law. However, same sex couples are recognized as de facto partners, as government professor offers them a range of rights and benefits equivalent to couples in de facto relationship. (Perry, 2006) Furthermore, gay couples can have the access to civil partnership registries in the states of Australian Capital Territory, tasmania and Victoria, while south Australia only recognizes same - sex couples as domestic partners". (Higgi, 2006) The map below shows the current status of homosexuality in the world. Some countries in Africa and Asia consider homosexual as a crime and offender may receive death penalty. On the other hand, same - sex marriage is legally recognized in countries such as Canada, spain, belgium and The netherlands. Although same - sex marriage is not allowed in Australia, same - sex couples are able to apply for civil unions in some states such as Tasmania, victoria, western Australia and act. 3 reasons for gay marriage.1 Human rights and freedom.1.1 violation of human rights According to the United Nation of Human rights, human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of gender, nationality, ethnic origin and religious view etc.
They indict that civil union do not include all the legal benefits, or the cultural significance of marriage. (Infoplease, 2007) For instance, all benefits and rights granted to a civil partnership are restricted within the state, as doma has denied the recognition from the federal government. Also, supporters of gay marriage argue that civil union cannot replace marriage, and it is just an alternative way of segregating gay couples from the society. (Kirk, 2010) This debate on the legalization of marriage will continue in the next few decades. 2.2 Current status The netherlands was the first country to legalize gay marriage in 2001, followed by belgium, Spain, canada, and south Africa. Some summary other countries include norway, sweden, portugal, Iceland and Argentina has also legalized same sex marriage recently. (Johnson, 2009) In 2004, the state of Massachusetts had made an unprecedented move to allow same - sex marriage, being the first state in us to legalize gay marriage. The court ruled that it is illegal not to allow same - sex couples to marry.
Marriage, act (doma) in 1998. This law is exercised in the us and it has further defined the term marriage, solely as about the legal union between a man and a woman. (Bower, 2010) In addition, this law asserts that assignment no states in the us are required to recognize same - sex marriage that is performed in other places. (Masci, 2007) Although gay marriage is not allowed in many countries, some places provide an alternative - civil union, as a compromise. In order to reduce controversy, the term civil union was used in replace of marriage, and it is an institution that offers same - sex couples all the rights, benefits and privileges that are equivalent to marriage. (Kirk, 2010) In 1989, denmark was the first country to establish civil union laws. Since then, many other countries, including Australia and some states in the us, have adopted the civil union law in attempt to resolve the problem of gay marriage. (Ellis-Christensen, 2010) Despite the establishment of civil union, advocates of gay marriage have never stopped battling for the right to marry.
This report will first review the history of battle to legalizing gay marriage, and the current status in todays world. It will then examine the reasons for and against the legalization of gay marriage. The conclusion will summarize the main arguments.0 overview of gay marriage.1 History, same - sex marriage is nothing new, with historical evidence showing that marriage has not always been the institution between heterosexuals. Gay marriages have existed in some form around 600 years ago. (Tulchin, 2007) Since early 1960s, gay activists have been striving for the right to marry. However, the issue of gay marriage only arose from the 1990s, as three same - sex couples filed a lawsuit against the state of Hawaii for the prohibition of gay marriage. The case has come to a conclusion that banning gay marriage is not constitutional, as there is no real practical reason and compelling arguments for. This event had triggered the worlds attention over the next decade and consequently led to the creation and approval of the defense.
What Are The reasons For And Against gay marriage law Essay
Gay marriages can be granted the legal rights which mean a threat to the stability of the traditional meaning of family. Gays and lesbians can also be granted the rights to legal marriage write in order to ensure that all citizens enjoy full human rights. Therefore, if gay marriage is legalized they can have the same rights as heterosexuals in terms of adoption and medical rights (Lopez 46). On the other hand, the religions would be offended since marriage is an institution supposed to be holy and ordained by god if gays and lesbians are legalized. Therefore, by allowing same sex marriage sanctity of marriage would be violated. If gay marriages are not legally recognized essay the harmful consequences the couples would face include inability to participate in medical decisions that involve their partner who are dying, lack of right to own common property and exclusion from employment benefits.
As a result, gay marriages are the eventual rejection of objective reality where an environment of going against the norm is created (Larocque 87). Reference this.0 Introduction, gay marriage is one of the most controversial issues in the modern world. For the past thousand years, marriage has been recognized as the social union between a man and a woman. In most cultures across the globe, homosexuality was viewed with disdain, and marriages between same - sex couples were forbidden. However, homosexual relationships are slowly gaining acceptance, as homosexuals have become vocal in fighting their right to marry in the early 90s. With an increased in tolerance for homosexuality in the society, the controversy over the legalization of gay marriage has been disputed among people in many nations. While the majority of the population believes that the legalization of gay marriage will have negative impact on the society, gay activists claim that it is against basic civil rights to prohibit them from marrying.
Should gay marriage be legalized? First, every person has a right to exercise and acquire freedom and equality as a basic law. In many countries such as the United States same sex marriages are outlawed although some government leaders insist on legalizing the gay marriages because they believe in the principle of equality. The church opposes same sex marriage since they believe that the bible instructs how Christians should properly live. The church believes that God wants marriage which is between a man and a woman. The church is against the legalization of gay marriages as they believe many people may choose to live homosexually thus promoting it as acceptable in the society.
According to the church, allowing the gay couples to adopt children would be an injustice as the children will lack the proper moral upbringing. If gay marriage was legalized they can have the same rights as heterosexuals in terms of adoption and medical rights (Lopez 46). Conclusion In conclusion, issue of same sex marriage has raised many debates for many years. Same sex marriages have some disadvantages while on the other hand, it can mean denial of basic rights to enjoy the human benefits. Same sex marriages are outlawed in many countries such as the United States although some government leaders insist on legalizing the gay marriages because they believe in the principle of equality. Many churches oppose same sex marriage and believe that God wants marriage to be between a man and a woman. As a result, the church is against the legalization of gay marriages because it can be viewed by the society as promoting homosexually in the society.
Free same sex Marriage Essays and Papers
The church believes that allowing the gay couples writing to adopt children would be an injustice as the children will lack the proper moral upbringing. The priorities of the gays right movement include combating discrimination in the workplace and securing professional the right to serve in the military as well as adopting children. Opponents of gay marriages cite the increased social costs such as healthcare thus affecting the economy. Those against this kind of marriage think that same sex couples should not be allowed to adopt children. The opponents are generally concerned about the harmful effect gay marriages would have on the society in case of legalization. They believe that the family institution is protected through heterosexual marriage whose main aim is to procreate. They further believe that marriage would no longer have the same meaning if homosexual couples find alternative methods of having children (Nagle 31).
Arguments Against Same sex Marriages For a long time the culture of men and women marrying each other in the society has been established globally. Two men or women marrying therefore have resulted to a controversy where people have differing opinions. Same sex marriages cannot have children. The debate for this issue of same sex marriage has existed for many years and a gay right movement was established in America during the 1960s. Getting married is healthy a decision which is personal and private. The controversy brought by gay marriages includes changing the norm of marriage and challenges in existing laws and religious traditions. Many religions in the world object to the issue of gay marriages on the grounds of morality. Churches base on their beliefs of what is wrong or right on scriptures which are holy writings.
people unite for their own personal reasons in order to enhance their personal well-up. Socially many people think that gay marriages are not acceptable therefore the couples should not have the right to get married. In some countries such as Canada, there is dramatic progress to acknowledge the rights of gays and lesbians. Court battles have been filed and to some extent gays and lesbians have succeeded in obtaining some degree of social recognition (Staver 5). The gay movement argument for same sex marriage is basically founded on the norm of formal equality. They argue that the state needs to accord the gays the same legal options as other different sex couples enjoy. This includes the right and duties required in civil marriage. Economic benefits that the proponents of gay marriages cite include increased revenue as a result of additional marriages through marriage taxes (Stockland 134).
Many religions also view same sex marriages as immoral and if gays and lesbians are legalized the church would be offended since marriage is an institution supposed to be holy and ordained by god. For that reason allowing same sex marriage means violation of the sanctity of marriage. There exists harmful consequences if gay and lesbian couples are not recognized in the society. The main challenges same sex marriages face include inability to participate in medical decisions that involve their partner who are dying, lack of right to own common property and exclusion from employment benefits. Opponents also fear that if gay marriages are recognized the society is more likely to accept same sex relationships as moral. The traditional definition dates of marriage is valuable and the society should define it as the only marriage and legitimize. Gay marriages are the eventual rejection of objective reality where an environment of going against the norm is created therefore; it is upon the government to decide whether to legalize this marriages or not (Larocque 87). Arguments for Same sex Marriages In Canada same sex marriages is legal.
Same-sex Marriage Essay - 570 Palabras Cram
Gay marriage pdf is also referred to as same sex marriage. Same sex relationships occur when men and women are attracted to someone of the same gender as themselves. According to many opponents, gay marriages can be described as more of the abandonment of gender distinctions because one cannot have same sex marriage while still believing that gender is relevant. For that reason, same gender getting married denies the obvious purpose of marriage between a man and woman which is procreation. This research will analyze the arguments for and against gay marriages and the religious view of same sex marriages. Denying same sex couples the legal rights to get married could mean denial of basic rights to enjoy the human benefits. On the other hand, if gay marriages are granted the legal rights this might be a threat to the stability of the traditional meaning of family. Many people in the society view gays and lesbians as immoral people since traditional belief of a marriage in the society is between one man and woman. Proponents and gays movement fight for legal right to marriage in order to ensure that all citizens enjoy full human rights.